Author: Tish

As I reflect further on The Stranger, by Albert Camus, I continue to appreciate the little details in the writing which display the leading character’s apathetic attitude towards society as he refuses to entertain the societal standards and expectations of the people surrounding him. Within the novel, the leading character Mersault can be characterized by his lack of emotional attachment and overall indifference towards humane experiences as seen in the following conversation between him and his love interest Marie.

“She was wearing a pair of my pajamas with the sleeves rolled up. When she laughed I wanted her again. A minute later she asked me if I loved her. I told her it didn’t mean any thing but that I didn’t think so. She looked sad. ” (p.35)

Mersault’s inner dialogue at this moment demonstrates his inability to filter or alter through his words in an attempt to please an individual he cares about. He openly admits to lacking these feelings for a woman who is patiently waiting for him to say that he loves her and then proceeds to bluntly state she is sad. Many can interpret this part of the statement to mean that he appeared confused as to why she would look sad whereas I believe he states this fully knowing why Marie would be upset and simply not caring.  This acts as one of the many inner perspectives the reader has of Mersault’s character helping to create a complex relationship between Mersault and the reader considering that he is portrayed to be a somewhat likable character despite his various unlikable traits i.e. his lack of emotional attachment.

𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚙𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚊𝚌𝚑𝚎𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚍𝚞𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚘𝚕 𝚒𝚗 𝙰𝚕𝚍𝚘𝚞𝚜 𝙷𝚞𝚡𝚕𝚎𝚢’𝚜 “𝙰 𝙱𝚛𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝙽𝚎𝚠 𝚆𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍” 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝙼𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚝 𝙰𝚝𝚠𝚘𝚘𝚍’𝚜 “𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝙷𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚍’𝚜 𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚎” 𝚖𝚊𝚔𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚊𝚗 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚜𝚘𝚗. 𝙱𝚘𝚝𝚑 𝚗𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚕𝚜 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚕𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚞𝚝𝚘𝚙𝚒𝚌 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚍𝚢𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚙𝚒𝚌 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚜 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚊𝚗 𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚑𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚜 𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚊𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚘𝚕 𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛 𝚊𝚕𝚕 𝚖𝚎𝚊𝚗𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚛𝚎𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚍𝚞𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚊𝚜 𝚊 𝚠𝚊𝚢 𝚘𝚏 𝚊𝚕𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚟𝚒𝚘𝚞𝚜𝚕𝚢 “𝚏𝚕𝚊𝚠𝚎𝚍” 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚝𝚢. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚝𝚠𝚘 𝚊𝚞𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚛𝚜 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚠𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚝𝚎𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚕𝚜 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚝𝚒𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚍𝚒𝚌𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚢 𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚖𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚙𝚘𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚟𝚒𝚎𝚠 𝚢𝚎𝚝 𝙸 𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚏𝚢 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝚘𝚞𝚝𝚕𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝙸 𝚊𝚖 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚙𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚢.

𝙰𝚕𝚍𝚘𝚞𝚜 𝙷𝚞𝚡𝚕𝚎𝚢’𝚜 “𝙰 𝙱𝚛𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝙽𝚎𝚠 𝚆𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍” 𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚞𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚡𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚕𝚒𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚝𝚢 𝚠𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚒𝚗 𝚜𝚎𝚡𝚞𝚊𝚕 𝚛𝚎𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚍𝚞𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚒𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚘𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚢 𝚕𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚎 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚞𝚏𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚏𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚌 𝚔𝚗𝚘𝚠𝚕𝚎𝚍𝚐𝚎 𝚒𝚜 𝚞𝚝𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚎𝚍 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚒𝚗 𝚊 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚝𝚢 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚜𝚎𝚡𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚕𝚒𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚢𝚎𝚝 𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚛𝚎𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚍. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚝𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚣𝚎𝚜 𝚎𝚏𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚢 𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚟𝚎 𝚎𝚕𝚜𝚎 𝚞𝚝𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚌 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚙𝚞𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚜 𝚢𝚎𝚝 𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜, 𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚊𝚕𝚕 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚎𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚛𝚘𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚌 𝚛𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚢. 𝚃𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚕𝚊𝚌𝚔 𝚘𝚏 𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕 𝚏𝚛𝚎𝚎𝚍𝚘𝚖 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚝𝚎 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚝𝚢 𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚋𝚘𝚞𝚛𝚜 𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚍𝚎𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚍𝚞𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚞𝚙𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚘𝚏 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗.

𝚆𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚜, 𝙼𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚝 𝙰𝚝𝚠𝚘𝚘𝚍’𝚜 “𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝙷𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚍’𝚜 𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚎” 𝚍𝚎𝚙𝚒𝚌𝚝𝚜 𝚊 𝚙𝚊𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚛𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚕 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚝𝚢 𝚛𝚘𝚘𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚒𝚗 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚒𝚏𝚢𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚜𝚝 𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚘𝚕𝚘𝚐𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚙𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚠𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚗 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚕𝚢 𝚝𝚘𝚘𝚕𝚜 𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚛𝚎𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚍𝚞𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚖𝚒𝚜𝚘𝚐𝚢𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚌 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚝𝚢 “𝙶𝚒𝚕𝚎𝚊𝚍” 𝚌𝚕𝚊𝚒𝚖𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚏𝚊𝚟𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚞𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚠𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚗 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚏-𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚝 𝚊𝚜 𝚒𝚝 𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚎𝚘𝚞𝚜𝚕𝚢 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚌𝚎𝚜 𝚠𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚗 𝚝𝚘 𝚊𝚍𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚜 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚞𝚎 𝚖𝚒𝚛𝚛𝚘𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚙𝚞𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕 𝚋𝚎𝚕𝚒𝚎𝚏𝚜. 𝙲𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚕𝚢, 𝙰𝚝𝚠𝚘𝚘𝚍’𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚛𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚕 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚝𝚢 𝚍𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚕𝚊𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚍𝚎𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗 𝚒𝚝𝚜 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚍𝚞𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚜𝚎𝚡𝚞𝚊𝚕 𝚛𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚕𝚢 𝚊 𝚠𝚊𝚢 𝚘𝚏 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚐𝚗𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚠𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚗; 𝚗𝚘𝚝𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚢 𝚋𝚢 𝚘𝚕𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚖𝚎𝚗 𝚒𝚗 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚙𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛 𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚖. 𝙸𝚗 𝚜𝚞𝚖𝚖𝚊𝚛𝚢, 𝙸 𝚊𝚖 𝚊𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚢 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚗𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜 𝙸 𝚠𝚊𝚜 𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖 𝚊𝚏𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚠𝚘 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚔𝚜 𝚊𝚜 𝚠𝚎𝚕𝚕 𝚊𝚜 𝚑𝚘𝚠 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚛𝚊𝚒𝚜𝚎 𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚕𝚊𝚛 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚒𝚝𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚙𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚊𝚌𝚑𝚎𝚜 𝚝𝚊𝚔𝚎𝚗.

𝙸𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚙𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚏𝚞𝚕 𝚚𝚞𝚘𝚝𝚎 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝙻𝚎𝚘 𝚃𝚘𝚕𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚢’𝚜 𝙰𝚗𝚗𝚊 𝙺𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚊, 𝚃𝚘𝚕𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚢 𝚜𝚔𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚏𝚞𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚎𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚍𝚘𝚞𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚛𝚍𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚎, 𝚊 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚖𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚠𝚎𝚕𝚕 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚘𝚍𝚊𝚢’𝚜 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚝𝚢. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚍𝚎𝚙𝚒𝚌𝚝𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚜𝚑 𝚟𝚒𝚎𝚠𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚙𝚞𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌 𝚞𝚙𝚘𝚗 𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚏𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚕𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚝𝚊𝚐𝚘𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚜, 𝙰𝚗𝚗𝚊’𝚜, 𝚊𝚏𝚏𝚊𝚒𝚛 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚕𝚕 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚕 𝚜𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚜𝚖. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚕𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚕 𝚋𝚎𝚝𝚠𝚎𝚎𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚗𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎 𝚒𝚗 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝚑𝚒𝚐𝚑 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚝𝚢 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝙰𝚗𝚗𝚊’𝚜 𝚊𝚏𝚏𝚊𝚒𝚛 𝚒𝚗 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚜𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚘 𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚋𝚛𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚂𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚊’𝚜 𝚊𝚏𝚏𝚊𝚒𝚛 𝚛𝚎𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚎𝚙𝚕𝚢 𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚎𝚍 𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚗𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚒𝚜𝚝 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚍𝚊𝚢.

“𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚘𝚗𝚕𝚢 𝚠𝚊𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚜𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚗 𝚒𝚗 𝚙𝚞𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌 𝚘𝚙𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚘 𝚏𝚊𝚕𝚕 𝚞𝚙𝚘𝚗 𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚊𝚕𝚕 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚠𝚎𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚒𝚛 𝚜𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚗. 𝚃𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚊𝚕𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚢 𝚖𝚊𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚢 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚒𝚛 𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚏𝚞𝚕𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚖𝚞𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚏𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚝 𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚠𝚑𝚎𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚛𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝 𝚖𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚊𝚛𝚛𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚍. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚐𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚗𝚞𝚖𝚋𝚎𝚛 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚖𝚒𝚍𝚍𝚕𝚎-𝚊𝚐𝚎𝚍 𝚙𝚎𝚘𝚙𝚕𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚗 𝚐𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚝 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚐𝚎𝚜 𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚊𝚜𝚎𝚍 𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚜𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚕 𝚒𝚗 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚝𝚢.” (𝙿.𝟷𝟿𝟿)

𝙰𝚗𝚗𝚊’𝚜 “𝚜𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚕” 𝚐𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚝𝚕𝚢 𝚊𝚝𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚜 𝚜𝚌𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚣𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚜 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚟𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚘𝚞𝚜 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚒𝚗 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚝𝚢. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚏𝚞𝚛𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚝𝚢 𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚕𝚢 𝚠𝚊𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚎𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚕𝚢 𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚍 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚜𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚘 𝚌𝚊𝚜𝚝 𝚑𝚊𝚝𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚜𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚗 𝚞𝚙𝚘𝚗 𝙰𝚗𝚗𝚊 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚌𝚑𝚘𝚒𝚌𝚎𝚜. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚜𝚑 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜 𝚝𝚘𝚠𝚊𝚛𝚍𝚜 𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚊𝚏𝚏𝚊𝚒𝚛 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚝 𝚞𝚙𝚘𝚗 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚝𝚢’𝚜 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚠𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚗 𝚊𝚜 𝚠𝚎𝚕𝚕 𝚊𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚍𝚒𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚊𝚖𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚖𝚗𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚘𝚌𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚜 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚠𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚗 𝚠𝚑𝚘 𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚢 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚜𝚎 𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚏𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜. 𝙰𝚍𝚍𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢, 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚑𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚕𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚗𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎 𝚒𝚗 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚝𝚢 𝚌𝚑𝚘𝚘𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚘𝚕𝚟𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚖𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚟𝚎𝚜 𝚒𝚗 𝚊 𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚍𝚘𝚎𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚗 𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚢 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚖. 𝚂𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚊’𝚜 𝚊𝚏𝚏𝚊𝚒𝚛 𝚒𝚜 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚍 𝚍𝚞𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚘𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚙𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚕 𝚢𝚎𝚝 𝚃𝚘𝚕𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚢 𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚍𝚘𝚖 𝚙𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚜 𝚂𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚊’𝚜 𝚒𝚖𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚒𝚗 𝚊 𝚗𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚕𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝. 𝚂𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚊’𝚜 𝚊𝚏𝚏𝚊𝚒𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚍 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚊𝚝𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚝 𝚗𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚕𝚢 𝚊𝚜 𝚖𝚞𝚌𝚑 𝚗𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚝𝚢 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚃𝚘𝚕𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚢’𝚜 𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚢𝚊𝚕 𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚞𝚜𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚊𝚏𝚏𝚊𝚒𝚛 𝚒𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚋𝚎 𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚢 𝚋𝚛𝚞𝚜𝚑𝚎𝚍 𝚘𝚏𝚏 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚑𝚎 𝚒𝚜 𝚠𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚝𝚎𝚗 𝚝𝚘 𝚋𝚎 𝚟𝚒𝚎𝚠𝚎𝚍 𝚊𝚜 𝚊 𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚍 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚕𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝-𝚑𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚗𝚘 𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚖𝚏𝚞𝚕 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜 𝚒𝚗 𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚍. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚕 𝚏𝚞𝚛𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚛𝚎𝚒𝚗𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚌𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚞𝚛𝚐𝚎𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚝 𝚞𝚙𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚟𝚊𝚜𝚝 𝚍𝚒𝚏𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚜 𝚋𝚎𝚝𝚠𝚎𝚎𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚖𝚊𝚕𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚏𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚕𝚎 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎.

𝙸 𝚠𝚊𝚜 𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚕𝚢 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚟𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚢 𝚊 𝚏𝚎𝚠 𝚙𝚎𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚊𝚜𝚙𝚒𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕 𝚊𝚞𝚝𝚘𝚋𝚒𝚘𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚙𝚑𝚢 𝚋𝚢 𝙳𝚊𝚟𝚒𝚍 𝙶𝚘𝚐𝚐𝚒𝚗𝚜, 𝙲𝚊𝚗’𝚝 𝙷𝚞𝚛𝚝 𝙼𝚎. 𝙳𝚊𝚟𝚒𝚍 𝙶𝚘𝚐𝚐𝚒𝚗𝚜 𝚒𝚜 𝚊 𝚄.𝚂. 𝙽𝚊𝚟𝚢 𝚂𝚎𝚊𝚕 𝚠𝚑𝚘𝚜𝚎 𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚛𝚎 𝚕𝚒𝚏𝚎 𝚒𝚜 𝚍𝚎𝚍𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚙𝚞𝚜𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚕𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚝𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚘𝚍𝚢. 𝙷𝚒𝚜 𝚋𝚒𝚘𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚙𝚑𝚢 𝚍𝚎𝚙𝚒𝚌𝚝𝚜 𝚠𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝙸 𝚠𝚘𝚞𝚕𝚍 𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚞𝚎 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚝𝚠𝚘 𝚖𝚘𝚜𝚝 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚜𝚔𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚜, 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚢 & 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚙𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚎. 𝚃𝚑𝚛𝚘𝚞𝚐𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚕, 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚟𝚒𝚎𝚠𝚎𝚛 𝚒𝚜 𝚋𝚛𝚘𝚞𝚐𝚑𝚝 𝚞𝚙𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚓𝚘𝚞𝚛𝚗𝚎𝚢 𝚘𝚏 𝙳𝚊𝚟𝚒𝚍 𝙶𝚘𝚐𝚐𝚒𝚗𝚜 𝚊𝚜 𝚊 𝚢𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚐 𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚎𝚘𝚞𝚜𝚕𝚢 𝚕𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚑𝚘𝚠 𝚝𝚘 𝚗𝚊𝚟𝚒𝚐𝚊𝚝𝚎 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚞𝚖𝚊 & 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚓𝚞𝚍𝚒𝚌𝚎-𝚏𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚍 𝚕𝚒𝚏𝚎. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚕 𝚞𝚝𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚎𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚞𝚛𝚜𝚎, 𝚍𝚒𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚝 𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚞𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝚒𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚖𝚘𝚗𝚕𝚢 𝚜𝚝𝚞𝚖𝚋𝚕𝚎𝚍 𝚞𝚙𝚘𝚗 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚛𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚏-𝚑𝚎𝚕𝚙 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜. 𝙶𝚘𝚐𝚐𝚒𝚗𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚘𝚍𝚞𝚌𝚎𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚟𝚒𝚎𝚠𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚘 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚍𝚢𝚜𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕 𝚏𝚊𝚖𝚒𝚕𝚢 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚏𝚒𝚛𝚜𝚝 𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚙𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚏𝚘𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚎𝚜 𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚙𝚑𝚢𝚜𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚊𝚋𝚞𝚜𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚗𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚏𝚊𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚘𝚠𝚊𝚛𝚍𝚜 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚖𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛. 𝙶𝚘𝚐𝚐𝚒𝚗𝚜’ 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚢 𝚘𝚗 𝚊 𝚌𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚍’𝚜 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚕 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚜𝚜 𝚒𝚜 𝚊 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝙸 𝚏𝚒𝚗𝚍 𝚊𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚕𝚢 𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚠𝚊𝚛𝚍 𝚢𝚎𝚝 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚍𝚞𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚖𝚢 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝.

“𝙸𝚝’𝚜 𝚊𝚕𝚖𝚘𝚜𝚝 𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚎, 𝚗𝚘 𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚠𝚑𝚘 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚜 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚘𝚛 𝚠𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚍𝚘, 𝚠𝚎’𝚛𝚎 𝚊𝚕𝚕 𝚋𝚘𝚛𝚗 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚊 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚕 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚜𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝’𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚕𝚢 𝚝𝚞𝚗𝚎𝚍. 𝚆𝚑𝚎𝚗 𝚢𝚘𝚞’𝚛𝚎 𝚜𝚒𝚡, 𝚜𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚗, 𝚘𝚛 𝚎𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝 𝚢𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚜 𝚘𝚕𝚍, 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚔𝚗𝚘𝚠 𝚠𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚏𝚎𝚎𝚕𝚜 𝚛𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚠𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚏𝚎𝚎𝚕𝚜 𝚠𝚊𝚢 𝚘𝚏𝚏. 𝙰𝚗𝚍 𝚠𝚑𝚎𝚗 𝚢𝚘𝚞’𝚛𝚎 𝚋𝚘𝚛𝚗 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚊 𝚌𝚢𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚛𝚘𝚛 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚙𝚊𝚒𝚗, 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚔𝚗𝚘𝚠 𝚒𝚝 𝚍𝚘𝚎𝚜𝚗’𝚝 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚋𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚠𝚊𝚢, 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚑 𝚗𝚊𝚐𝚜 𝚊𝚝 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚎 𝚊 𝚜𝚙𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚒𝚗 𝚢𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚓𝚊𝚌𝚔𝚎𝚍 𝚞𝚙 𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚍. 𝚈𝚘𝚞 𝚌𝚊𝚗 𝚌𝚑𝚘𝚘𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚒𝚐𝚗𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚒𝚝, 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚍𝚞𝚕𝚕 𝚝𝚑𝚛𝚘𝚋𝚋𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚒𝚜 𝚊𝚕𝚠𝚊𝚢𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚊𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚍𝚊𝚢𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚗𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝𝚜 𝚋𝚕𝚎𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚘𝚐𝚎𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚋𝚕𝚞𝚛𝚛𝚎𝚍 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚢.” (𝚙𝚐.𝟸𝟸)

𝚃𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚘𝚝𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚒𝚜 𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝙸 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚌𝚑𝚘𝚜𝚎𝚗 𝚝𝚘 𝚏𝚎𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎 𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚍𝚞𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚒𝚝𝚜 𝚊𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚝𝚘 𝚎𝚟𝚘𝚔𝚎 𝚜𝚞𝚌𝚑 𝚛𝚊𝚠 𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜 𝚒𝚗 𝚊 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚎𝚛 𝚜𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚑𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚐𝚒𝚗𝚐. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚒𝚜 𝚋𝚘𝚛𝚗 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚞𝚝𝚘𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚕 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚜𝚜 𝚒𝚗 𝚖𝚢 𝚘𝚙𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚒𝚜 𝚍𝚎𝚋𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚗𝚞𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚘𝚞𝚜 𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚌 𝚜𝚝𝚞𝚍𝚒𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚞𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚘𝚗 𝚎𝚒𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎. 𝙸 𝚊𝚖 𝚌𝚑𝚘𝚘𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚘 𝚏𝚘𝚌𝚞𝚜 𝚘𝚗 𝙶𝚘𝚐𝚐𝚒𝚗𝚜’ 𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚝𝚘 𝚠𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚎 𝚜𝚞𝚌𝚑 𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚡 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚒𝚗 𝚊 𝚠𝚊𝚢 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚞𝚜𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚛𝚒𝚙𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚞𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚛𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚜 𝚍𝚒𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚝. 𝚃𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚎𝚡𝚊𝚌𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚐𝚑𝚝 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚒𝚜 𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝙸 𝚏𝚒𝚗𝚍 𝚖𝚢𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚏 𝚙𝚘𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚘𝚏𝚝𝚎𝚗 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚊𝚖 𝚚𝚞𝚒𝚝𝚎 𝚏𝚊𝚖𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚊𝚛 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑. 𝚃𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚎, 𝙸 𝚊𝚖 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚕𝚢 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚎𝚙𝚒𝚌𝚝 𝚒𝚝 𝚒𝚗 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚠𝚊𝚛𝚍 𝚠𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚜𝚝𝚢𝚕𝚎 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎. 𝚃𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚊𝚗 𝚎𝚡𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚛𝚢 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚒𝚗 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚠𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚜𝚝𝚢𝚕𝚎 𝚑𝚊𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚏𝚊𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚝𝚘 𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚟𝚒𝚎𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚜. 𝙰𝚕𝚋𝚎𝚒𝚝, 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚠𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚜𝚝𝚢𝚕𝚎 𝚖𝚊𝚢 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚋𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚖𝚘𝚜𝚝 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚏𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕 𝚢𝚎𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚄.𝚂. 𝙽𝚊𝚟𝚢 𝚂𝚎𝚊𝚕 𝚠𝚑𝚘 𝚑𝚊𝚜 𝚋𝚎𝚎𝚗 𝚗𝚒𝚌𝚔𝚗𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚍 “𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚝𝚘𝚞𝚐𝚑𝚎𝚜𝚝 𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚟𝚎”, 𝚑𝚊𝚜 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚐𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚞𝚙 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚜𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚎𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚐𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚠𝚑𝚘 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚎 𝚑𝚒𝚖 𝚏𝚒𝚗𝚍 𝚊 𝚠𝚊𝚢 𝚝𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚝𝚎 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚠𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚝𝚎𝚗 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚔.

𝙸 𝚊𝚖 𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚕𝚢 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚜𝚎𝚍 𝚘𝚏 𝚊𝚕𝚕 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚎𝚖𝚜 𝚠𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚝𝚎𝚗 𝚋𝚢 𝚆.𝙱. 𝚈𝚎𝚊𝚝𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚛𝚘𝚞𝚐𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚎𝚛. 𝚈𝚎𝚊𝚝𝚜 𝚊𝚜 𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚞𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚛 𝚑𝚊𝚜 𝚊𝚗 𝚒𝚗𝚗𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚕𝚢 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚡 𝚟𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚝𝚢 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚘𝚙𝚒𝚌𝚜 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚛𝚘𝚞𝚐𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚝𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚘𝚏 𝚙𝚘𝚎𝚖𝚜. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚎𝚖𝚜 𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚎 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚝𝚘𝚙𝚒𝚌𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚗𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎, 𝚊𝚐𝚒𝚗𝚐 & 𝚍𝚎𝚊𝚝𝚑, 𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚌 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚎𝚜, 𝚕𝚘𝚟𝚎, 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚗 𝙸𝚛𝚒𝚜𝚑 𝚖𝚢𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚕𝚘𝚐𝚢 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚏𝚘𝚕𝚔 𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚜. 𝙰 𝚙𝚘𝚎𝚖 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝙸 𝚏𝚎𝚕𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚖𝚘𝚜𝚝 𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚌𝚝 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚠𝚊𝚜 𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚗𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚍 𝙾 𝙳𝚘 𝙽𝚘𝚝 𝙻𝚘𝚟𝚎 𝚃𝚘𝚘 𝙻𝚘𝚗𝚐. 𝚆𝚒𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚞𝚛𝚝𝚑 𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚏𝚒𝚛𝚜𝚝 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚕𝚊𝚜𝚝 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚣𝚊, 𝚊 𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚕𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚝 𝚕𝚘𝚟𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚊𝚗 𝚘𝚕𝚍 𝚜𝚘𝚗𝚐 𝚒𝚜 𝚞𝚝𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚎𝚍 𝚛𝚎𝚙𝚎𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚍𝚕𝚢 𝚊𝚜 𝚜𝚑𝚘𝚠𝚗 𝚋𝚎𝚕𝚘𝚠,

𝚂𝚠𝚎𝚎𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚝, 𝚍𝚘 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚕𝚘𝚟𝚎 𝚝𝚘𝚘 𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚐:

𝙸 𝚕𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚍 𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚐

𝙰𝚗𝚍 𝚐𝚛𝚎𝚠 𝚝𝚘 𝚋𝚎 𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚏𝚊𝚜𝚑𝚒𝚘𝚗

𝙻𝚒𝚔𝚎 𝚊𝚗 𝚘𝚕𝚍 𝚜𝚘𝚗𝚐.

 

𝙰𝚕𝚕 𝚝𝚑𝚛𝚘𝚞𝚐𝚑 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚢𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚢𝚘𝚞𝚝𝚑

𝙽𝚎𝚒𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚠𝚘𝚞𝚕𝚍 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚔𝚗𝚘𝚠𝚗

𝚃𝚑𝚎𝚒𝚛 𝚘𝚠𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚐𝚑𝚝 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛’𝚜

𝚆𝚎 𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚜𝚘 𝚖𝚞𝚌𝚑 𝚊𝚝 𝚘𝚗𝚎.

 

𝙱𝚞𝚝 𝙾, 𝚒𝚗 𝚊 𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚞𝚝𝚎 𝚜𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚎𝚍

𝙾 𝚍𝚘 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚕𝚘𝚟𝚎 𝚝𝚘𝚘 𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚐,

𝙾𝚛 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚠𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚐𝚛𝚘𝚠 𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚏𝚊𝚜𝚑𝚒𝚘𝚗

𝙻𝚒𝚔𝚎 𝚊𝚗 𝚘𝚕𝚍 𝚜𝚘𝚗𝚐. (𝚙.𝟿𝟾)

𝙰𝚏𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚙𝚘𝚎𝚖 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚢 𝚏𝚒𝚛𝚜𝚝 𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚎, 𝙸 𝚙𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚎𝚍 𝚒𝚗 𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚝𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚝 𝚝𝚘 𝚏𝚞𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚑𝚎𝚗𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚕𝚢𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚖𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚕𝚎 𝚒𝚝𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚏 𝚌𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚒𝚗 𝚗𝚞𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚘𝚞𝚜 𝚠𝚊𝚢𝚜 𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚝 𝚕𝚘𝚟𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚐𝚑 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚝𝚠𝚘 𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚍𝚒𝚋𝚕𝚢 𝚘𝚙𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚜 𝙸 𝚑𝚊𝚍 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚟𝚒𝚎𝚠 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚎 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖. 𝙰 𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚘𝚏 𝚖𝚎 𝚋𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚝𝚘 𝚒𝚖𝚊𝚐𝚒𝚗𝚎 𝚊 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚐, 𝚍𝚞𝚜𝚝𝚢 𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚍 𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚢𝚎𝚛 𝚊𝚜 𝚒𝚝 𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚢𝚎𝚍 𝚊 𝚜𝚔𝚒𝚙𝚙𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚍 𝚛𝚎𝚙𝚎𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚍𝚕𝚢 𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚕 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢, 𝚒𝚝 𝚌𝚘𝚞𝚕𝚍 𝚍𝚛𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚖𝚊𝚍. 𝚃𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚗𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚛𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚛𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚕𝚎 𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚝 𝚕𝚘𝚟𝚎 𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚍 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚙𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚌 𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚖𝚢𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚏 𝚊𝚕𝚖𝚘𝚜𝚝 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚝𝚎𝚕𝚢 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚍𝚒𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚗𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚐𝚑𝚝 𝚘𝚌𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚒𝚗 𝚖𝚢 𝚑𝚎𝚊𝚍. 𝚂𝚒𝚖𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚎𝚘𝚞𝚜𝚕𝚢, 𝚊𝚗𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚘𝚏 𝚖𝚎 𝚑𝚊𝚍 𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚎𝚍 𝚖𝚢 𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚊𝚔𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚕𝚎 𝚘𝚙𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚔 𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚜𝚘𝚗𝚐𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝙸 𝚑𝚊𝚍 𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚕𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚍 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚏𝚎𝚎𝚕 𝚗𝚘𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚐𝚒𝚊 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚊𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚕𝚘𝚟𝚎 𝚠𝚊𝚜 𝚗𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛 𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚝, 𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚕𝚢 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚐𝚘𝚝𝚝𝚎𝚗. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚞𝚛𝚝𝚑 𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚎 𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚏𝚒𝚛𝚜𝚝 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚕𝚊𝚜𝚝 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚣𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚜 𝚈𝚎𝚊𝚝𝚜’ 𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚝𝚘 𝚌𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚘 𝚗𝚞𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚘𝚞𝚜 𝚊𝚞𝚍𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚜 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚕𝚕 𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚖𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚜𝚎. 𝙸𝚏 𝚊𝚗𝚢𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚐, 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚘𝚙𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚜 𝙸 𝚑𝚊𝚍 𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚎𝚘𝚞𝚜𝚕𝚢 𝚋𝚎𝚎𝚗 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚎𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚍𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚗𝚞𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚘𝚞𝚜 𝚠𝚊𝚢𝚜 𝚒𝚗 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚟𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚘𝚞𝚜𝚕𝚢 𝚝𝚊𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚝 𝚏𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚜 𝚜𝚞𝚌𝚑 𝚊𝚜 𝚋𝚊𝚌𝚔𝚐𝚛𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚍, 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚘𝚖𝚒𝚌 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚜, 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚢 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚜.

𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚖𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚒𝚗 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚕𝚎𝚊𝚍 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚝𝚊𝚐𝚘𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚝, 𝙽𝚒𝚌𝚔 𝙲𝚊𝚛𝚛𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚢, 𝚞𝚝𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚜𝚎 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚍𝚜 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚕𝚕 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚊𝚕𝚠𝚊𝚢𝚜 𝚠𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚋𝚎 𝚖𝚊𝚛𝚔𝚎𝚍 𝚊𝚜 𝚊 𝚙𝚒𝚟𝚘𝚝𝚊𝚕 𝚖𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚕 “𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝙶𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚝 𝙶𝚊𝚝𝚜𝚋𝚢” 𝚋𝚢 𝙵. 𝚂𝚌𝚘𝚝𝚝 𝙵𝚒𝚝𝚣𝚐𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚕𝚍. 𝙲𝚊𝚛𝚛𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚢 𝚑𝚊𝚜 𝚋𝚎𝚎𝚗 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚒𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚖𝚘𝚜𝚝 𝚘𝚙𝚞𝚕𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚕𝚊𝚟𝚒𝚜𝚑 𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚜𝚎 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚒𝚎𝚜 𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚝𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚍 𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚑𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚗𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚖𝚢𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚘𝚞𝚜𝚕𝚢 𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚐, 𝙼𝚛. 𝙶𝚊𝚝𝚜𝚋𝚢. 𝙰𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚙𝚘𝚒𝚗𝚝, 𝙲𝚊𝚛𝚛𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚢 𝚑𝚊𝚜 𝚗𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛 𝚖𝚎𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚘-𝚌𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚍 𝙶𝚊𝚝𝚜𝚋𝚢 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚒𝚝𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚗𝚞𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚘𝚞𝚜 𝚘𝚞𝚝𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚑 𝚛𝚞𝚖𝚘𝚞𝚛𝚜 𝚜𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍 𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚑𝚒𝚖 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚒𝚜 𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚕𝚢 𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚍𝚒𝚐𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚏𝚒𝚛𝚜𝚝 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚎 𝚐𝚕𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚜𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝚑𝚒𝚖𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚏.

“𝙷𝚎 𝚑𝚊𝚍 𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚜𝚎 𝚛𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚜𝚖𝚒𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚘𝚏 𝚎𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚕 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚒𝚗 𝚒𝚝, 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚖𝚊𝚢 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚊𝚌𝚛𝚘𝚜𝚜 𝚏𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚘𝚛 𝚏𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚜 𝚒𝚗 𝚕𝚒𝚏𝚎. 𝙸𝚝 𝚏𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚍, 𝚘𝚛 𝚜𝚎𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚏𝚊𝚌𝚎, 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚠𝚑𝚘𝚕𝚎 𝚎𝚡𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚕 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚊𝚗 𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚗 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚘𝚗 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚊𝚗 𝚒𝚛𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚓𝚞𝚍𝚒𝚌𝚎 𝚒𝚗 𝚢𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚏𝚊𝚟𝚘𝚞𝚛. 𝙸𝚝 𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚘𝚍 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚓𝚞𝚜𝚝 𝚊𝚜 𝚏𝚊𝚛 𝚊𝚜 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚠𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚋𝚎 𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚘𝚍, 𝚋𝚎𝚕𝚒𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚍 𝚒𝚗 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚊𝚜 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚠𝚘𝚞𝚕𝚍 𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚋𝚎𝚕𝚒𝚎𝚟𝚎 𝚒𝚗 𝚢𝚘𝚞𝚛𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚏.” (𝚙.𝟻𝟸, 𝙵𝚒𝚝𝚣𝚐𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚕𝚍, 𝟷𝟿𝟸𝟻)

𝙲𝚊𝚛𝚛𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚢 𝚍𝚎𝚙𝚒𝚌𝚝𝚜 𝙶𝚊𝚝𝚜𝚋𝚢’𝚜 𝚍𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚊𝚗𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚝𝚘 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚊𝚜 𝚘𝚞𝚝𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚑𝚕𝚢 𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚜𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚌 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚜𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚝𝚘 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑𝚑𝚘𝚕𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍𝚕𝚢 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚏𝚎𝚎𝚕 𝚊𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚐𝚑 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚕𝚢 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚒𝚛𝚛𝚎𝚟𝚘𝚌𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚢 𝚜𝚎𝚎𝚗. 𝙶𝚊𝚝𝚜𝚋𝚢’𝚜 𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚝𝚘 𝚌𝚊𝚙𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚊𝚝𝚎 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚊𝚌𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚜 𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚎𝚜 𝚒𝚝 𝚝𝚘 𝚋𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚍𝚒𝚋𝚕𝚢 𝚎𝚊𝚜𝚢 𝚝𝚘 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚗 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚕𝚢 𝚎𝚡𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚟𝚊𝚐𝚊𝚗𝚝 𝚒𝚖𝚊𝚐𝚎. 𝙰𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚛, 𝙸 𝚏𝚎𝚎𝚕 𝚊𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚐𝚑 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚛𝚒𝚙𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚒𝚜 𝚜𝚘 𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚕𝚢 𝚙𝚞𝚝, 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚎, 𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚒𝚝 𝚝𝚘 𝚋𝚎 𝚎𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚕𝚢 𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚐𝚒𝚗𝚐. 𝚃𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚎𝚡𝚚𝚞𝚒𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚎𝚕𝚢 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚛𝚒𝚋𝚎𝚜 𝙶𝚊𝚝𝚜𝚋𝚢’𝚜 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚘𝚗𝚊, 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚎 𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚗 𝚘𝚙𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚞𝚗𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚝 𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚜𝚎 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚒𝚛 𝚕𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚑𝚘𝚠 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚖𝚊𝚢 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚍 𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚜 𝚠𝚑𝚘 𝚋𝚎𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚌𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚕𝚢 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚕 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝.