by Kevin (10) on June 13th, 2010
The Color Purple shocked me – at first. What with all the vulgarity from the get-go, the language put me off balance, making it uncomfortable to read (especially with Mr. Macknight narrating for the class). Also, the grammar/vocabulary was exceptionally terrible. I understood that it was attempt at embodying a less-educated, black woman of the earlier 1900’s – and a good attempt – but it took some getting used to. After adjustments and bracing took place, reading The Color Purple became easy.
I’d first like to point out and discuss the boldness of the novel. Now, by “bold” I mean “holy heck, I was not expecting that, and I kind of wish I wasn’t shown that, but now that I’ve seen it I guess I can also find some truth in it.” I felt The Color Purple’s bold voice as soon as Mr. Macknight started the first letter to God. My stomach shrunk inward, my breathing grew rather stifled, and I could feel the blood rushing to my face (also a side/main effect of our school lunches). To be perfectly honest, I do vouch for women’s rights and I am very aware of the cruelties of man throughout history, but learning the facts as history is different from hearing them through a story and a victimized character. Reading through Celie just made it all the more real and unsettling. Automatically, I was put in a position of sympathy for Celie and shame for my gender. It was humbling though. Saddening.
The relationships confused me though. Greatly. Simply all the cheating and infidelities, they were met by responses that were… not enough? It was strange to see the calmness of Harpo towards Sofia’s new man, and of Celie towards Shug’s sudden appearance. Not to say that Celie actually had any feelings for Mr. ___, but she treated it quite well and adored Shug instead. While she was having sex with Mr. ___. More confusing bits circled around the incident of Sofia’s arrest. Sofia punches Squeak and leaves in a huff with her man, only to be arrested soon after. Immediately, Squeak decides to take care of Sofia’s children, showing almost zero remorse towards Sofia, at all. She even goes as far as to visit her uncle, the warden, to help Sofia, and ends up getting raped. All for Sofia. It was extremely awkward to read and rather unbelievable. And also Buster’s strange tendency to just stick around waiting for Sofia was not expected. I guess what I’m trying to say is that the Color Purple has a world with alien values and expectations to me; alien not only in that I have never experienced them, but never fathomed them either.
Still, with that single “complaint”, I’d have to say that it was a good novel. Good because it touched real close to home on a tragic, real-life scale. Good because it expressed in such interesting and powerful ways. Good because, hey, it wasn’t about snobby rich women looking for adventure and eventually getting themselves killed. Straight up, Mr. Macknight. Straight up.
2 people like this post.
by Mr. MacKnight (67) on June 2nd, 2010
Over the summer I’d like you to study the 15 sonnets by Shakespeare that we will be reading as the first of our Part 4 works.
1. Please go to my public folder, here—
http://public.me.com/ericmacknight
— and download the three documents concerning Shakespeare’s sonnets: an introduction to the sonnet, the 15 sonnets you will be responsible for, and a set of 20 questions about them for you to answer in writing over the summer holiday. The path is
Handouts / IB English A1 / Shakespeare’s Sonnets.
Please submit your answers to the 20 questions as a post on this blog, marked with the category ‘Sonnets’.
Before you can post to this blog, you will have to send me an email message (ericmacknight AT mac DOT com) so that I can enrol you as a contributor.
We will use the sonnets as an opportunity to practice literary commentaries, both written and oral, as commentaries count for 40% of your final grade for the course; and to practice comparison-contrast essays, which you will need for World Lit Assignment 1 and Paper 2 on your IB exams. It’s very important that you complete your answers to the 20 questions and post them to this blog before the 2010-11 school year begins.
2. Please look up and learn the meanings of the following poetic terms:
- sonnet, English and Italian
- scansion / metre
- iambic pentameter
- blank verse
- trochee
- dactyl
- anapest
- tetrameter
- trimeter
- prose vs. poetry
- stanza
- couplet
- triplet
- quatrain
- sestet
- octave
- alliteration
- assonance
- consonance
- half-rhyme / slant rhyme / off-rhyme
- eye rhyme
If you have any questions or problems with this assignment, leave a comment on this post and I will respond to it.
Cheers,
etm
by Chi (13) on May 31st, 2010
The Colour Purple was a refreshing break to our streak of novels based on well-off, beautiful ladies with charming husbands and an affinity for suicide. It was also a huge shock, opening the book to its first page and going “holy wow, this book is going to be intense”.
First of all, The Colour Purple lived up to my expectations of intensity. Celie went though horribly tough times, with her abusive step-father, abusive husband and almost losing touch with her sister, Nettie. Celie was an amazing character to me, and that’s not only because unlike the heroines in our previous novels, she doesn’t waste time pitying herself. Celie’s a tough cookie. She makes the best of her crappy situations and puts up with people mistreating her. Despite her confused voice in the first few pages of the novel, I find her to be a strong and independent character.
Speaking of characters, Harpo was one that really confused me. Sometimes, I find him admirable, for being respectable to Celie and his wife. Sometimes, I find him despicable for beating Sofia. As Alice Walker said in that podcast, he’s very torn between being a man as his father was, and respecting his wife as he knows he should. In that sense, I find him to be such a realistically-written character. As with people in real life, I have trouble judging whether I truly like him or not.
We haven’t had much material to discuss sexuality or gender preference yet, and I like to bug Allyne. Shug and Celie’s relationship makes me wonder, whether Celie is attracted to women because she is homosexual, or if she is attracted to women because she trusts only them, as opposed to men. Without Shug, would Celie have found somebody to love?
Lastly, I want to discuss Celie’s voice versus Nettie’s voice. Although Celie’s uneducated, her grammar and spelling poor, I believe if she could write the way Nettie does, their voices would be almost identical. They come across to me as so alike, in their thoughts and actions. I think it is their experiences that really set the two sisters apart.
Quick recap: The Colour Purple was intense. I liked it, I liked the way it was written, I liked the way the material was shocking and inspiring. I especially liked the happy ending with everybody reunited and one big family; I didn’t expect that. I enjoy unexpectedly happy endings.
3 people like this post.
by Shun Yang (12) on May 31st, 2010
The Color Purple is a very good novel indeed. Although the beginning is a little disturbing, the story turns out to be great! It is a very vivid novel that tells of something almost everyone is aware of now: the prejudices that existed (and to a certain extent, still exists) in the US. After reading about the book, sometimes I still have a hard time trying to believe that the society then really was like that: physical, psychological and sexual abuse everywhere.
I really like how there is a wide variety of characters in the characters. There is Celie, the initially ‘weak’ and ’submissive’ protagonist who gets abused by her father and her husband. Then there is Sofia, the ’strong’ and ‘determined’ character who stands up to what she believes in. There is also Nettie, the educated and loving sister of Celie. Not only does this variety of characters make the story more realistic, it also sets the plot in motion: characters learning from each other, striving to be better and stronger.
There are two main prejudices in the story: Gender and Race (as we mentioned in class). My thoughts while reading was : which is the more important one in the book? I’ve tried to think it through, I can’t come up with an answer. They are both important to the story as a whole.
Gender and sexuality plays a major part in Celie’s development as a character. Because she is abused by men since young, she looks toward women, and it is due to this that her sexual identity becomes that of a lesbian. Gender and sexuality also presents itself in the novel in other characters. Mr. Albert, for instance, turns into a ‘feminine’ character after Shug and Celie left him. He cooks, cleans and even sews later on. Also, Shug and Sofia are both rather ‘masculine’ characters, shown by their determination, independence and uprightness.
Race is also very important to the novel. White people are portrayed of having education and well-off families. Blacks, on the other hand, are usually portrayed as uneducated and poor. Although initially having a pessimistic view on blacks, Celie changes and appreciates the blacks after reading of the rich culture of the Africans there from Nettie’s letters. Another interesting point regarding race is the portrayal of God. As most Christians around me are associated with the West (generally White people), even I came to think that God is White and holds the image of an grey-bearded man (similar to Dumbledore). It is interesting, therefore, to see how Shug changes all this. Instead of picturing God as a White man, Shug’s God is everywhere and everything: God is genderless and universal. In the end, Celie’s view of God also changes: her final entry is addressed to: “Dear God. Dear stars, dear trees, dear sky, dear peoples. Dear Everything. Dear God.”
An interesting point to note about the plot is that love is so fickle and inconsistent. There have to be at least 10 different romantic relationships in this short novel! However, some of the relationships are important to self-realization, such as that of Celie and Shug. Tying love with marriage, the marriages then were hardly ever associated with love. If anything, marriages then associated more with money and raising children. Due to this, marriages do not last. Therefore, I believe that marriages in the society is meaningless. What’s the point of marrying when it’s going to last for a short while? For example, Harpo and Sofia gets married but separate with different partners later on. Perhaps it was so because marriages then were simple rituals and did not require any legal papers of the sort, hence it was easy to break off a marriage. Almost all the marriages in the book do not fare well: Mr. Albert and Celie, Sofia and Harpo, Shug and Grady. In fact, the only marriage that I can think of right now that actually lasted for a while is between Nettie and Samuel. I have one question regarding the idea of marriage in the novel: Why does Celie choose not to accept Mr. Albert’s late proposal near the end of the novel? Has she changed so much that she wants to be independent now? Or is it because she still fears men?
The last thing I want to discuss about is the color purple. I was a little confused about what it was at first, but after Jun explained it to me, I think it’s interesting that the color purple is everywhere, but we just can’t see it. It is the color purple that gave Celie hope that her sister is still alive. It is also the color purple that changed Celie’s view on so many things. It changed Celie’s life. I just wish I could be more like Celie, able to appreciate the color purple and be content with life.
To finish off, The Color Purple is a really good read: short, simple but also full of ideas and questions. 9/10
4 people like this post.
by Sean (12) on May 30th, 2010
When I began The Color Purple I didn’t like it because of the language. I thought difficult language was essential for an English A1 Higher work. But I soon realised that the story, and the questions raised by the story, was the important part. As the language played a vital role in conveying Celie’s voice and presenting her character, it was invaluable to the story. I fell in love with the characters, especially Celie, just like Alice Walker did. I’m not exactly sure why, but her diction definitely plays a part, as does her resilience to adversity and her ability to love and forgive.
I think Ian and I had a very similar response to the passage about God, where Shug and Celie discuss what God is. I also very much enjoyed the scene where Albert tells Celie about his thoughts about life because it so clearly demonstrates how thinking and reflecting can so dramatically alter someone’s personality and outlook on life. I think the paragraph on page 288 starting with “I think us here to wonder, myself” had the most impact on me because I realised that I’m never going to find the answers to the biggest questions, but I should keep looking for them because I’ll find many other important answers in the process. It also made me realise just how young I am and how much learning and thinking I still have ahead of me.
I’m so glad we finally read a book about a strong, respectable woman. After To the Lighthouse, Anna Karenina, and especially The Awakening, I think I was definitely starting down the path to misogyny. I’m exaggerating of course, but my outlook on women had definitely been affected. I think it’s safe to say this book helped me get back to where I used to be before reading about all these self-indulgent emotional messes. This is one reason why The Odyssey is so amazing: Odysseus and Penelope are both awesome! My attention span is waning and I’m running out of things to say about The Color Purple. I think for the first time after reading a book I feel more about than I think about it, which is a strange experience for me. I’ll have to pursue this interesting phenomenon later.
1 person likes this post.
by Jun (13) on May 29th, 2010
Although we read many books with oppressed women, The Awakening, again, was slightly different. At first I quite liked Edna, she seemed just like the other beautiful women we read about in Anna Karenina, or, Tess of The D’urbervilles, but then we came to see that she is constantly thinking of herself
Edna thinks of herself too much. Everyone has problems of their own, most peoples’ problems are probably more important than Edna’s, but Edna is always only thinking of her own issues. If anyone were to look at her they would wonder why she thinks so much in this way. She has no financial issues, with a reliable, providing husband, and she has no problems with her husband, he is not a violent alcoholic. In fact, Edna has things going pretty well, she is young and beautiful, popular, and charismatic. She also has guys hanging around her, which must be a pretty big deal for any woman, but not for Edna, she seems to be disinterested in any of these things that are going well and focuses on the few negative things that are actually happening.
Although Edna wants to “break free” it seems that there is not too much to break free from. Her society has not got many limitations, a reception day once a week doesn’t seem too bad. Since her husband is working, Edna should be able to tolerate this quite easily. But, Edna’s mind wanders off to other things. What I find myself thinking, (As we thought in class) What does Edna want? One moment she wants to be an artist, the next she wants to be a mother. Whenever she comes close to one, she instantly rebounds to the other.
Dr. Mandelet tries to cure Edna of her psychological problems, but little does he realize that it is himself who is a victim of society. Edna is changing “She was becoming herself and daily casting aside that fictitious self which we assume like a garment with which to appear before the world.” Dr. Mandelet, of course, cannot cure Edna, because she has no medical disorder but is only trying to live the life that she wants, one that is not limited by what other people think. As a result, she puts herself before her children and everyone else. Although it is selfish of Edna to do this, she is one of the few who is capable of trying to live an individual life while most people easily succumb to the pressures of society.
Why do Edna’s feelings of Robert fluctuate so often? Edna is in love with Robert, isn’t she? After he leaves for Mexico she thinks of him almost constantly, but when he finally returns she leaves him and his passionate emotions for Madame Ratignolle. Why does she do so? Perhaps it is inevitable for Edna to miss a birth, the coming of a new life into this world (What we learnt in class about the womb being a “heaven”). Then again, maybe Edna simply does not love Robert as much as she thinks she does. Whenever he is nearby she doesn’t think much of him, but when he is far away her longing for him is unbearable. When Robert leaves for Mexico, Edna perceives Robert to be “the perfect man”, and lives in a fantasy. When Robert returns, she quickly realizes that he is not as “perfect” as she thought. Edna does not truly love Robert, when he longs for her, she is indifferent to him, however, when he leaves and seems to ignore her, she starts to become obsessed with him. Edna is just finding some way to have difference in her life, when he is there she doesn’t care and needs a change in her life, but when he is not there, she wants him back because she is in need of a relationship. Edna’s relationships are as unstable as it seems, she is never settled in one place at one time. The affairs she has, mask the many negative, mundane, even repetitive aspects of life. The life that Edna leads is influenced by society, therefore, limitations are placed upon Edna so that her life requires change to counterpart boredom.
At first I found this book to be boring, but as I wrote this response I changed my opinion almost instantly, I realized that there is actually much more to Edna than we think. Although Edna is not the most attractive character to a reader because of her selfish attitude in thinking about herself first, coming to think of it, doesn’t everyone think of themselves first, maybe Edna is the only one to confidently admit it. We all have the desire to be free like Edna does and take the path less travelled by, but most people choose to follow the crowd. Everyone wants to stand out, ,to be unique and remembered in a positive way, but they don’t want to stand out too much so as to social distress.
1 person likes this post.
by Ian Noguchi (13) on May 29th, 2010
My first impression of this book was pretty bad. The opening was simply disturbing and I didn’t want to read it. But, as we all know, books we read in the IB are not like that from beginning to end. In fact, there was only a small portion which I could not bear. It was an easy read, but it was very interesting.
One thing I remember about this book the most is Shug’s explanation about God. Celie explains God as a ‘man’ and “Trifling, forgitful, and lowdown.” I think many people think this way, wondering why the almighty, for example, allows catastrophes kill many innocent people. This makes God look terrible, but Shug does not look at ‘it’ that way. “Any God I ever felt in church I brought in with me. . . . They come to church to share God, not to find God.” “God is inside you and inside everybody else.” These quotes really struck me when I first read them as it shows a completely different view of God from Celie (a white man), but made even more sense to me. Instead of God being an individual looking down on earth, ‘it’ is everything. This new idea which Shug taught me was further emphasized in Celie’s last entry: “Dear God. Dear stars, dear tress, dear sky, dear peoples. Dear Everything. Dear God.” To answer the question why God allows bad things to occur, I believe the answer is ‘Because God is Everything’. It is sorrow, but it is also happiness. I feel that I now understand why so many people believe in God, (but I am still an atheist, so I do not believe in his/her/its existence).
Another aspect of this book I found interesting and struck me the most out of all the novels I have read, was how Celie changed throughout the book. She was pessimistic (which is obvious) and had many negative views, but at the end she seemed like a completely different person. What was it that changed her so much? I believe that Shug played an important role as her love gave Celie a new perspective on life. But I did not really care about HOW she changed, but rather the fact that she did change, and this taught me that we can move forward, no matter what burden you may carry inside of you (I know this is a naïve statement as people can get scarred terribly, but I want to believe in this possibility).
Now that I have written this personal response, now I feel how heavy this book is to me.
1 person likes this post.
by Jun (13) on May 26th, 2010
The colo(u)r purple was one of the more interesting books we read this year. At first I found it to be quite obscene because of all of the profanity, especially when Pa rapes Celie near the start of the book, but after more abuse and harassment was repeated I got used to it, I realized that this was the world that the characters lived in. I learnt a lot about the culture at the time, I knew some general things about the period of time that the story was based on. I knew it was bad, with mistreated women and racial discrimination, but I didn’t think it to be as bad as Celie put it, perhaps she had one of the worse childhoods compared to others.
I found religion to be something of importance in the book. Celie’s first letters always started with “Dear God”, but after finding Nettie’s letters she started to address her letters to Nettie. Shug influences Celie to start to think more about religion, instead of picturing God as an old wise white man, Shug pictures him as an omnipotent and omniscient power which includes “eveything” in the world. Celie starts off with ideas of religion being the Christian ones that she has been taught, but after she experiences more troubles and hardships she starts to break free and think of her own God, one that the Church does not perceive. As a result, Celie develops more spiritual faith and becomes a stronger individual. At the same time, a similar transformation is happening in Nettie as she starts to learn more about the Olinka and their beliefs she starts to develop her own beliefs of Adam and the “naked people”. The colour purple (Not the book) appears to symbolize this individuality, and freedom which develops within Celie. I believe that if she were to be asked what her favourite colour was, she would most likely answer purple. She paints her room purple. and makes purple pants for Sofia, who is a strong individualistic character. This change in ideas not only happens in Celie, but also in Mr._____ everyone in the book is changing towards becoming a stronger individual.
There were so many relationships between people, people were always marrying and remarrying with each other. No-one seemed to mind this infidelity, when Sofia came back with the Prizefighter, or when Harpo finds squeak. Of all the relationships, the only stable one was the one between Celie and Nettie which never broke apart. It must have been the traumatic experiences that they went through which made them so close to one another. Even though there was so much happening, the characters still stayed strong, especially Sofia who was incriminated a long time for nothing serious. Even though the whites constantly press them down, these people always rise back up again. Their lives are still thriving after every negative experience.
This book was a great read, it was also the easiest book to read so far, 100 pages could be finished in no time. Despite this though, there was one thing I was wondering about. When Celie and her friends are in Harpo’s house they all hear a humming sound that gradually grows louder, no one knows what it is except Celie. What is this sound? Other than this question, I think I am satisfied with this book because it gave me a whole new insight into a different world, one that I never would have imagined to exist in real life.
1 person likes this post.
by Allyne (7) on May 17th, 2010
I was reading the comments on the other responses, and I noticed the one Mr. MacKnight left on Chi’s, asking “can Edna, like Anna and Tess, be seen as a casualty of social convention?”
… Okay, I have to say, I am REALLY sick of this idea. Unbelievably sick. MAYBE it’s just because I’m a neo-classicist at heart, or MAYBE it’s because I’m a bigoted religious fanatic, which is OBVIOUSLY the only reason why I can possibly think that it’s wrong for people to cheat on their spouse. But really now, is it REALLY society? Who said that society isn’t(or WASN’T, really… adultery and fornication have become all too commonplace in our modern society, sadly) right to shun and despise it? And anyway, say it IS totally natural. As human beings, should we REALLY give in to base instincts? Are we REALLY no better than animals? (I honestly fail to see how people can tell me that I’M the one with the gloomy outlook on like when THEY are the ones preaching depressing stuff like that, BUT THAT’S BESIDE THE POINT)
Look, before I didn’t feel quite so negatively towards Edna, I even sympathized with her a bit, but now that SOCIETY VS NATURE is brought up AGAIN, I just HAVE to fight it.
Edna is no “casualty of society”. From a Christian standpoint, she is in the wrong. She committed a sin, one of the ten commandments, no less. Now, we can debate the authenticity of the bible and its doctrine all year long, but even with religion put aside, she is wrong in SO many ways . If we’re going to drag nature into it again, is it not NATURAL to love, to desire a committed relationship, to feel betrayed and angry when your “mate” (to use the most biological term possible) finds someone else to love as much as, or ever more than, you? Some argue that we are trained to feel these emotions in these circumstances through experience gained as one grows. But again, this just lumps us in with mindless animals again. Furthermore, to be human means to have the power to shape ourselves and our destinies. You, me, Edna Pontellier, and every other human being out there is fully capable of controlling their emotions, changing their behaviors, and shaping their future. The idea that we are driven by our emotions, that we “are who we are” and we can’t fix it is complete nonsense. (Again, WHY do people call ME the pessimist?) Now, I’m not saying that Edna could CHOOSE not to love Robert, but she COULD have chosen not to cheat on her husband. Contrary to popular belief, women DO exercise rationality when making decisions. It’s never just the woman being slave to her emotions. (AGAIN: Like an animaaaaaaaaal.) Also, Edna SHOULD have considered her family. Regardless of whether a family life was what she wanted, that’s the life she had right then. She had a responsibility to her husband and children. Maybe in hindsight, it was a responsibility she wished she had never had, but you can’t just break a promise that big out of selfishness like that. When she said that she’d “never sacrifice herself for her children”, I was actually quite disgusted. This strikes me as a horribly selfish thing to do. Look, Edna, honey, you have a responsibility to these kids. What’s that? You don’t want to be a family woman? TOO BAD, SWEETIE. These kids are human beings who DEPEND on you. You have a DUTY to them, AND to your husband. I really don’t care if you don’t like it. LEARN TO LIKE IT. Man, right now, I even have more sympathy towards Medea than I do you.
TL;DR
1. Edna only has herself to blame
2. I am a religious freak who thinks that adultery is wrong under ALL circumstances.
3. Humans are not just talking animals
1 person likes this post.
by Sean (12) on May 11th, 2010
I can’t believe she kills herself. I seriously can’t believe it. When I compare Edna’s situation to Anna’s, Anna’s is by far the worst: her child has been taken from her, she has left her husband, Society holds her in contempt. Edna has a supportive husband, loving children, and even friends like Madame Ratignolle and Mademoiselle Reisz. The only common denominator in their cases is that they lose love—Edna from Robert and Anna (she thinks) from Vronsky.
This makes me wonder about women. Do women get so attached to love that if it is lost they kill themselves? Like I said in class, maybe women instinctively want to kill themselves, but when they think about it they realise they don’t want to. Anna, for certain, would not have killed herself if she had thought it through. Edna is the same. She has so much to live for: she can watch her children grow old, see her grandchildren, travel the world, study painting in Paris, read books and become intellectual etc. This leads me to the conclusion that she is not thinking (even though I know I would be thinking) when she swims out to the sea. It seems to me she’s not thinking long before that, when Robert comes to visit her. I was deeply confused by Edna’s choice to go visit Madame Ratignolle when she and Robert finally get together. When asked about her decision by Dr Madelet, she mostly says “oh well!”, and even realises she can’t explain her thoughts: “She felt that her speech was voicing the incoherency of her thoughts” (105). It seems that as soon as she kisses Robert her mind and body turn on auto-pilot. She has planned to go see Madame Ratignolle, so she goes. She comes back with the plan of seeing Robert, but he isn’t there, so the auto-pilot is temporarily interrupted. When it comes back on the circuits in the brain are fried, sending the body on a crash course to Grand Isle and subsequently to the depths of the ocean. This is not normal, so she must either actually have a mental breakdown or she’s just spoiled. I’m inclined towards the spoiled option. She even says, “But I don’t want anything but my own way” (105), showing us that she’s self-indulgent and naive, not realising that her problems are insignificant compared with others’.
I don’t have any connection with this novel. Before Edna’s suicide it was boring and pointless. I found the writing unimaginative, overusing the word “delicious” to a disturbing extent, and using too simple sentences like “Mr. Pontellier wore eyeglasses”. There are many simpler sentences—even entire paragraphs—, especially when describing characters, that completely blew my mind but I can no longer find. (Shun Yang: Hey! That rhymes!) She uses the word “is” too much, and her adjectives always repeat themselves, making me unimpressed with her writing ability, especially in comparison with Hardy or Tolstoy. Moreover, this novel doesn’t raise any profound questions for me. All of the potential questions like “how does one’s society affect one’s actions?” or . . . no that’s it . . . are overshadowed by Edna’s inexcusably self-centered and useless suicide. That one question is raised by nearly all the books we read anyways, so The Awakening is therefore a complete waste of paper. If The Awakening and To the Lighthouse got into a Worst Book in the IB Curriculum competition, To the Lighthouse would still win. But the contest became more interesting with the entrance of The Awakening.
1 person likes this post.
|
Success Success is peace of mind, which is a direct result of self-satisfaction in knowing you made the effort to do your best to become the best that you are capable of becoming.
—John Wooden
Your Daily Chinese Character
|
"The arts, ideas, natural beauty, and good conversation provide lasting pleasure."
|
Recent Comments